Decoding Open-Source Licensing

Decoding Open-Source Licensing

A Comprehensive Guide to Understanding and Choosing the Right Open-Source License for Your Project or Business

Revolutionize Your Software with OSS Licenses

Open-source software (OSS) licensing is a legal framework that governs the use, modification, and distribution of open-source software. These licenses grant users certain rights and impose specific conditions that promote collaboration and innovation.

By using OSS licenses, you can empower your software to reach new heights while fostering transparency and community participation.

Open-source software is everywhere, we all are using it on a daily basis, but not understanding its licensing can lead to serious legal consequences. Developers, organizations, and users must educate themselves on OSS licensing terms before utilizing open-source software. Don't let non-compliance put you in hot water.

Properly adhering to OSS licenses fosters a healthy ecosystem for sharing knowledge and innovation in the software development community.

Categories of Licenses

There are various types of OSS licenses, each with its own terms and conditions. These licenses can be classified into two categories

  1. Permissive licenses: Requires minimal obligations like an attribution to the original authors, overall allowing users more freedom in using, modifying, and distributing the software. Some of the examples are MIT License, BSD License

  2. Copyleft licenses: These licenses require that any derivative works based on the OSS also be licensed under the same terms thus preserving the open-source nature of the software. GPL is a popular example of a copyleft license.

Maximize Open-Source Success: Key Considerations

  1. License compliance: Ensure that you follow the terms and conditions of the OSS license when using or distributing the software. Failure to do so can result in legal consequences.

  2. Intellectual property or I.P.: When contributing to an OSS project, be aware of the intellectual property implications. Companies should have a clear policy for employees contributing to OSS projects and ensure that they do not inadvertently disclose proprietary information.

  3. Security: Open-source software can be more transparent in terms of security, as the source code is available for review. However, this also means that vulnerabilities can be discovered and exploited by malicious actors. Regularly update and patch your OSS dependencies to minimize security risks.

  4. Maintenance & Support: OSS projects may not have the same level of dedicated support as proprietary software. In some cases, you may need to rely on community support, self-help, or hire professionals to assist with maintenance and troubleshooting

  5. Code quality and documentation: The quality of the code and documentation can vary significantly between OSS projects. Carefully evaluate the project's maturity, maintainability, and the availability of documentation before adopting it.

  6. Community involvement: Participating in the OSS community can help improve the software, fix bugs, and add new features. Actively engaging in the community can also provide networking opportunities, professional development, and influence over the project's direction.

  7. Licensing compatibility: When integrating code from multiple OSS projects, ensure that the licenses are compatible, and the resulting combination adheres to the requirements of all relevant licenses.

  8. Dual-licensing: Some OSS projects offer dual-licensing, where the project is available under both an open-source license and a proprietary license. This can provide more flexibility and support options for companies.

  9. Exit strategy: Have a plan for transitioning to an alternative solution if the OSS project is discontinued, becomes unstable, or no longer meets your needs.

  10. Legal consultation: If you have any doubts or concerns about OSS licensing or compliance, consult with a legal professional with expertise in intellectual property and OSS licensing.

Types of open-source software(OSS) licenses

There are numerous types of OSS licenses, each with its own set of terms and conditions. Some of the most common OSS licensing and their key differences

  1. MIT: Massachusetts Institute of Technology License

  2. Apache License 2.0

    • The Apache License is a permissive open-source software license created and maintained by the Apache Software Foundation (ASF).

    • It allows users to freely use, modify, and distribute software, including any derivative works, with minimal restrictions. The current version is Apache License 2.0.

    • Examples -

  3. BSD: Berkeley Software Distribution License

    • A family of permissive open-source licenses originating from the University of California, Berkeley. There are several variants, such as the 2-Clause and 3-Clause BSD licenses.

    • Examples of BSD 2-clause

  4. GPL: GNU General Public License

    • A copyleft open-source license created by the Free Software Foundation (FSF) for the GNU Project. It comes in several versions, with GPL v2 and GPL v3 being the most widely used.

    • Examples of GPL v2

    • Examples of GPL v3

  5. AGPL: GNU Affero General Public License

    • A copyleft open-source license based on the GPL, with an additional requirement that any changes made to the software must also be made available to users interacting with it over a network.

    • Examples -

  6. LGPL: Lesser General Public License

    • The LGPL is a weak copyleft open-source license created by the Free Software Foundation (FSF). It is intended for use with software libraries and aims to strike a balance between the strong copyleft nature of the GPL and more permissive licenses.

    • The LGPL allows developers to link their proprietary software to LGPL-licensed libraries without the need to release their entire software under a copyleft license. Any modifications to the LGPL-licensed library itself, however, must be shared under the same LGPL terms.

    • There are two major versions of the LGPL: LGPL v2.1 and LGPL v3.

    • Examples of LGPL v2.1 -

    • Examples of LGPL v3 -

  7. MPL: Mozilla Public License

    • A weak copyleft open-source license created by the Mozilla Foundation. It allows for the use, modification, and distribution of the software, but any changes to the original code must be shared under the same license.

    • Examples -

  8. SSPL: Server Side Public License

    • The SSPL is an open-source license created by MongoDB, Inc. It is a modification of the GNU Affero General Public License (AGPL) v3, with additional terms related to providing software as a service.

    • Under the SSPL, if a company modifies the software and offers it as a service to others, they must also make the entire source code of their service, including the modified software, available under the SSPL.

    • This requirement is intended to prevent cloud service providers from profiting from open-source software without contributing back to the community.

    • The SSPL has been a controversial license, as some consider it too restrictive and not fully aligned with the principles of open-source software.

  9. Creative Commons (CC)

    • Creative Commons (CC) licenses are a set of copyright licenses designed for various types of creative works, such as text, images, music, and video.

    • These licenses offer creators a simple and standardized way to grant specific usage rights to their works while retaining their copyright.

    • Creative Commons licenses are not specifically intended for software, but they are widely used for documentation, educational materials, artistic works, and other content.


Understanding OSS licensing is crucial for developers, organizations, and users who want to utilize open-source software, as non-compliance with the license terms can result in legal consequences.

Properly adhering to OSS licenses fosters a healthy ecosystem for sharing knowledge and innovation in the software development community.

In case you want to choose a license for your open-source project, you can use the website - choose a license

Unveiling new insights: My debut blog wraps up. I hope you have learned something new as I did.
If so, kindly like it or share it with others so they can also see it.